[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: BFD relocations
From: |
Geoff Keating |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: BFD relocations |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:09:46 -0700 |
> Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:05:37 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <address@hidden>
> > 1) Is it possible to know for sure that a smaller range could be
> > flushed safely?
>
> I believe glibc has an "aux" mechanism to convey this. I don't know
> how it works, though. Geoff?
The kernel does, in some versions, pass the size of a cache line (8,
16, whatever), but I don't think glibc passes it to userland yet.
There's no way to know which lines don't need flushing.
--
- Geoffrey Keating <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), (continued)
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Philip Blundell, 2002/06/14
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Camm Maguire, 2002/06/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Philip Blundell, 2002/06/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Camm Maguire, 2002/06/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Philip Blundell, 2002/06/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Camm Maguire, 2002/06/17
- [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Andreas Schwab, 2002/06/14
- [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Richard Zidlicky, 2002/06/17
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: Flushing the d-cache (was Re: BFD relocations), Camm Maguire, 2002/06/17
- [Gcl-devel] MIPS bfd_get_relocated_section_contents broken, Camm Maguire, 2002/06/19
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: BFD relocations,
Geoff Keating <=