[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gcl-devel] address@hidden Re: Patch to GCL 2.4.0 configure

From: Camm Maguire
Subject: [Gcl-devel] address@hidden Re: Patch to GCL 2.4.0 configure
Date: 13 Jan 2002 13:09:23 -0500

Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Message-Id: <address@hidden>
From: address@hidden
To: Camm Maguire <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Patch to GCL 2.4.0 configure 
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 18:03:25 -0500

> Greetings, and thanks for he patch!  One question, won't this work
> too?
>       EMACS_SITE_LISP=`$EMACS -q -batch --no-site-file -l conftest.el 2>&1 | 
> sed -e /Loading/d | sed -e /load/d `
Without trying it, I'd say that it would work...in fact I believe this is
the form that I had sent to WFS quite some time ago.  

> This is what is used in the other two instances, which I noticed you
> did not need to patch, so I assume worked OK.  I'd like to keep it
> uniform if possible, and you've spotted correctly an existing
> inconsistency.  I've committed the above fix.
Yes...the consistency argument should win.  

> BTW, if you would like, you are more than welcome to join the
> project.  Please let me know if you are interested, and we can set you
> up with the right permissions on the web site, etc.
I'm flattered, but I just hack as required to get things running.  I
will continue to send small patches to the group for consideration if
that's okay...I really feel someone with the bigger picture needs to
be checking my hacks.

thanks for your response...

Dr Michael A. Koerber

------- End of forwarded message -------

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]