[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shared libraries
From: |
Andreas Rottmann |
Subject: |
Re: Shared libraries |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:09:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I think we can get rid of the glib wrapset in the long run, since this
>> one will be provided by guile-gobject, so let's not worry about this.
>
> So everyone will use guile-gobject?
>
I think there should be one canonical place for the GLib bindings, and
as guile-gobject is the only place for GLib 2.0 bindings ATM, AFAIK
this seems natural to me.
> Also, have you done any tests to see what the overhead of dynamic
> wrapping is when compared to the older static style? I presume the
> dynamic style is much more space efficient, but how does performance
> compare? Do you expect any major differences?
>
I still have to run some benchmarks. Any proposals how to best test this?
Regards, Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | address@hidden | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
This reality is really just a fucked-up dream -- Papa Roach