freetype
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft] question on FT number formats


From: Johannes Walther
Subject: Re: [ft] question on FT number formats
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 18:07:50 +0100 (CET)

George Williams <address@hidden> wrote:

> These are actually truetype formats.
> They are fixed point numbers 
>   16.16 means that the binary point should be
> shifted by 16 bits right
> (so to get a double you would do: <number>/65536.0)
>   26.6 means the binary point should be shifted 6
> bits right (so to get
> a double <number>/64.0)

Ok, I see--thanks. But if there's nothing else, I
guess my problem is another one.

For Type1 with pfm I get absolutely strange values.
For a URW Gothic L Book with pfm and
FT_KERNING_UNSCALED I get 65464 instead of -72 or
65488 instead of -48 but the positive values are ok.
With FT_KERNING_DEFAULT I get 372416 instead of -384.

For correct values I'd have to subtract the high
values from 65536 resp. 372800 - but since they are ok
if afm are attached I can't rely on that workaround.

What can be wrong here?

Johannes




        
                
___________________________________________________________ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: 
http://mail.yahoo.de




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]