freetype
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [ft] Segfault in FT_Get_Name_Index, Solaris 9, FreeType 2.1.8+


From: Ian Brown
Subject: RE: [ft] Segfault in FT_Get_Name_Index, Solaris 9, FreeType 2.1.8+
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:11:24 +0200

Yes - a segfault if the pointer is not valid and a bus error if the pointer is 
valid but not aligned to the pointer size (32 or 64 bit depending on how it is 
compiled).

Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan-Åke Larsson [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: 17 May 2006 17:08
To: Ian Brown
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [ft] Segfault in FT_Get_Name_Index, Solaris 9, FreeType 2.1.8+

Ian Brown wrote:
> On the SPARC architecture, you can only access 16 bit values on 16
> bit address boundaries, 32 bit values on 32 bit address boundaries
> etc.

Yep: But dereferencing a bogus pointer would sometimes cause a bus
error, sometimes a segfault, I'd imagine.

/JÅ


-- 
ceci n'est pas une .signature




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]