[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype] freetype-config
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype] freetype-config |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 08:32:57 -0600 (CST) |
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > Maybe the new freetype-config script could help me over my configure
> > hurdle, but unfortunately, it seems to be installed with wrong
> > permissions (under Solaris 2.6):
> >
> > % ls -l /usr/local/bin/freetype-config
> > ---------- 1 root staff 1236 Nov 28 22:33
> > /usr/local/bin/freetype-config
>
> Very strange. Here is the installation command of buids/unix/install.mk:
>
> $(INSTALL_SCRIPT) -m 755 $(BUILD)/freetype-config \
> $(bindir)/freetype-config
>
> Usually, $(INSTALL_SCRIPT) expands to plain $(INSTALL) -- is it
> possible that you have $INSTALL_SCRIPT set in your environment to a
> Solaris-specific program which doesn't accept the -m option?
The configure script put this in config.status:
ac_given_INSTALL="/usr/local/bin/install -c"
My /usr/local/bin/install is symbolically linked to /usr/ucb/install
since that is what most packages want. According to the manual page,
-m is indeed supported.
I think the problem is this:
/usr/local/bin/install -c -m a+x ...
The assumption here is that install supports symbolic mode setting. I
am sure there are installs that do support this, but this is not
de-facto BSD "standard".
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen