[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Nov 2000 17:11:42 +0100 (CET) |
> > What about using `ft2' instead of `freetype2', even in the FT library
> > itself? So we would have
> > #include <ft2/internal/...>
>
> I am not sure ft2 is better than freetype2.
It works nicely with the 8+3 file name restriction also. Addionally,
it is easy to omit the `2' in `freetype2', which can cause weird
errors in case FT 1.3 has the same header file.
Werner
- [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, David Turner, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, David Turner, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/09
- Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, Ramiro Estrugo, 2000/11/12
- [Freetype] Re: [Freetype]2.0 release install problems on Unix systems, ramiro, 2000/11/22