[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Gone Redmond
From: |
Chris Liddell |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Gone Redmond |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:44:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
On 21/09/17 14:24, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Chris Liddell
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>> My point was whether "dropping vc2005" meant just the VS2005
>> project/solution files, or whether it was something more entailed, for
>> example, switching to a requirement for full C99?
>
> I am only interested in improving msbuild/vc toolbox support.
>
Thanks, that's what I figured, but thought it worth checking.
It's a pain we have to keep using VS2005 for Ghostscript binaries, but I
still get occasional complains that we dropped support for Win95 - I
really can't face the deluge of complaints if we dropped Win2k thru
WinXP right now!
Chris