[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Support standardized CBDT/CBLC Re: Freetype-devel Digest,
Re: [ft-devel] Support standardized CBDT/CBLC Re: Freetype-devel Digest, Vol 129, Issue 10
Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:03:38 -0800
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
On 15-11-07 09:02 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Those are source. Pre-built fonts here:
> Note that our sample fonts have version 2.0 as the table version number, where
> as the OpenType spec (which came after we shipped fonts) decided to use
> version 3.0. I suggest accepting both, possibly just warn about 2.0.
> On 15-11-06 09:13 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>> Hi Behdad,
>> do you have such a font and/or can point me in the direction of
>> one such file? I'll add support for that to the TODO list of you-know-what
>> It doesn't currently parse those those tables, at all. I assume
>> that's because color glyphs is a recent (>2009) addition.
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:13:54 -0400
>> From: Behdad Esfahbod <address@hidden>
>> To: "address@hidden"
>> Subject: [ft-devel] Support standardized CBDT/CBLC
>> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>> Apparently somewhere during the standardization, CBDT/CBLC
>> got their version
>> bumped to 3:
>> FreeType currently only accepts 2, which is the number we
>> used in our
>> proposal. ttsbit.c needs to be updated to accept
>> 3. I suggest we accept both
>> 2 and 3 for both color and non-color versions of this.
>> Or you can only accept
>> 2 for non-color (EBDT/EBLC), and accept both 2 and 3 for
>> color ones. If doing
>> so, you want to disable color in EBDT/EBLC as well..
>> Whatever you do, please don't break our existing fonts, that
>> is, CBLC/CBDT
>> with version number 2.