freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] C89 vs C99


From: suzuki toshiya
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] C89 vs C99
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:48:31 +0900
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)

Dear Werner,

APIs would be kept to use C89-compatible types,
but C99-only types are used in internal part?
Some people may want to see the types like
int32_t, int16_t...

And, I'm afraid some legacy platforms in builds
lack C99-savvy compilers. They should be dropped?

Regards,
mpsuzuki


Werner LEMBERG wrote::
Folks,


I wonder whether it makes sense to start using C99 features in
FreeType (or rather a subset of C99 that is compatible with C++).
Are there still *important* compilers that are stuck with C89?


    Werner

_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]