[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] C89 vs C99
From: |
suzuki toshiya |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] C89 vs C99 |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:48:31 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
Dear Werner,
APIs would be kept to use C89-compatible types,
but C99-only types are used in internal part?
Some people may want to see the types like
int32_t, int16_t...
And, I'm afraid some legacy platforms in builds
lack C99-savvy compilers. They should be dropped?
Regards,
mpsuzuki
Werner LEMBERG wrote::
Folks,
I wonder whether it makes sense to start using C99 features in
FreeType (or rather a subset of C99 that is compatible with C++).
Are there still *important* compilers that are stuck with C89?
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel