[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine
From: |
Vernon Adams |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine |
Date: |
Sun, 12 May 2013 08:52:51 -0700 |
:) ah thanks. it was under my nose all the time.
very interesting.
On 12 May 2013, at 07:34, octoploid <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> 12.05.2013, 15:52, "Vernon Adams" <address@hidden>:
>> I have been testing the new adobe-Freetype CFF engine, and was wondering if
>> the default 'darkness' of stem darkening is a little too high?
>> How does the width of stems in a font effect the amount of darkness
>> rendered? I think someone mentioned that thinner stems will render with
>> relatively more darkness than thicker stems? Is that correct? Or is the
>> amount of darkness a uniform value across all rendered fonts?
>
> You should read src/cff/cf2font.c:
> 95 /*
> 96 * Total darkening amount is computed in 1000 unit character space
> 97 * using the modified 5 part curve as Avalon rasterizer.
> 98 * The darkening amount is smaller for thicker stems.
> 99 * It becomes zero when the stem is thicker than 2.333 pixels.
> 100 *
> 101 * In Avalon rasterizer,
> 102 *
> 103 * darkenAmount = 0.5 pixels if scaledStem <= 0.5 pixels,
> 104 * darkenAmount = 0.333 pixels if 1 <= scaledStem <= 1.667 pixels,
> 105 * darkenAmount = 0 pixel if scaledStem >= 2.333 pixels,
> 106 *
> 107 * and piecewise linear in-between.
> 108 *
> 109 */
> 110 if ( scaledStem < cf2_intToFixed( 500 ) )
> 111 *darkenAmount = FT_DivFix( cf2_intToFixed( 400 ), ppem );
> 112
> 113 else if ( scaledStem < cf2_intToFixed( 1000 ) )
> 114 *darkenAmount = FT_DivFix( cf2_intToFixed( 525 ), ppem ) -
> 115 FT_MulFix( stemWidthPer1000,
> 116 cf2_floatToFixed( .25 ) );
> 117
> 118 else if ( scaledStem < cf2_intToFixed( 1667 ) )
> 119 *darkenAmount = FT_DivFix( cf2_intToFixed( 275 ), ppem );
> 120
> 121 else if ( scaledStem < cf2_intToFixed( 2333 ) )
> 122 *darkenAmount = FT_DivFix( cf2_intToFixed( 963 ), ppem ) -
> 123 FT_MulFix( stemWidthPer1000,
> 124 cf2_floatToFixed( .413 ) );
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2013/05/11
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/11
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/11
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Dave Arnold, 2013/05/11
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2013/05/12
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Vernon Adams, 2013/05/12
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, octoploid, 2013/05/12
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine,
Vernon Adams <=
Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, James Cloos, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Ross Lagerwall, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Ross Lagerwall, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, octoploid, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/03