[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:13:42 +0100 (CET) |
> Guys, I'm not a hardcore C coder, and don't know about private RAM
> allocation per-process, and how that's impacted by putting structs
> inside of .c files instead of .h files. Of course, I'm willing to
> understand why that's the case, I just don't necessarily know some
> of that stuff. So, likely all code that I write is going to have
> the potential of being implemented more efficiently by people with
> more experience in coding. I don't really want to burden you guys
> with "babying" me through the best way to implement code, but if you
> can nudge me in the right direction sometimes that would be helpful.
Don't worry! *Many* people are following the FreeType git repository,
and only David (who currently doesn't follow regularly) has noticed
it. His background as a developer for embedded systems has sharpened
his eyes for such glitches. And thankfully he has some time again to
contribute.
Werner
- [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, David Turner, 2013/01/16
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/01/16
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, Infinality, 2013/01/16
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/17
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, Infinality, 2013/01/17
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2013/01/17
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/18
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2013/01/18
- Re: [ft-devel] Patch to fix the ttsubpix implementation, Behdad Esfahbod, 2013/01/18