freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF


From: suzuki toshiya
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:32:22 +0900
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080406)

Sorry, I don't have working older Acrobat in my hand.
Could you post screenshots if possible?

Regards,
mpsuzuki

Ivan Nincic wrote:
> Hi Suzuki, 
> I think the font may have worked for older Acrobat Reader versions. 
> IvanN
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 5:42 AM
> To: Werner LEMBERG
> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF
> 
> Another followup for the standard behaviour.
> Although Adobe Acrobat 9 on Microsoft Windows does not show any glyphs for
> sample PDF, sample OTF can be browsed by fontview.exe (on Microsoft Windows
> XP SP2).
> 
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
> 
> suzuki toshiya wrote (2012/04/14 21:23):
>> Ah, I slipped to check what is the standard behaviour, thank you.
>> I got same results on Adobe Acrobat 9 on Microsft Windows and Preview 
>> (5.0.3) on Mac OS X.
>>
>> Regards,
>> mpsuzuki
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 2:00 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF
> 
> It seems that bb211ce6ce7f712e4cc4423e93c6c13780122512
> (2011-09-07, between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7) relates this change of the behaviour.
> The changeset was introduced to fix savannah bug #33816. I should take a
> look more in detail and think how to fix both issues.
> 
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
> 
> suzuki toshiya wrote:
>> I will check which changeset relates this difference.
>>
>> Ivan Nincic wrote:
>>> Hello Werner,
>>>
>>> FYI: I run into a regression issue with the latest FT (trunk) version.
>>> Attached is a sample font. I don't claim that this is a valid font 
>>> however FT was able to render the file in 2.4.4 but not in 2.4.9.
>>>
>>> IvanN
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]