Re: [ft-devel] FreeType patches to support amalgamation

[Antoine Leca]

Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> Why do you butcher perfectly legal code C-code?
> You problem is in the tool - not it in FreeType.
This is not fair. The exercise do show some areas in Freetype which code
will be clearly made better after the corrections proposed by Vinnie.
Examples are the #undef pp-instructions before #define (patches #2, or
#5 2nd part); or the correction in cidload.c of the local methods
t1_init_loader (resp. t1_free_loader) by cid_init_loader (resp.
cid_free_loader) (patch #6.)

I also second Werner thinking this will need a fair amount of editor
work, hence time, to be digested.


Antoine