[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:46:55 +0200 (CEST) |
>> If I've understood James correctly, the new code is actually
>> compiler dependent but the compilers he tested all produce the same
>> result.
>
> To me the code looks like a welcome
> microoptimization/simplification. The result should be the same
> regardless of compiler.
Oh, so it's really me who is dumb :-) If James confirms your
statement, I'm going to replace the code as he has suggested in his
patch..
Werner
- [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/04
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Behdad Esfahbod, 2011/04/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/05
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Алексей Подтележников, 2011/04/07
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/07
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/08
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/08
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/04/18
- Re: [ft-devel] [PATCH] Improve FT_MulFix, James Cloos, 2011/04/18