Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up

[GRAHAM ASHER]

Aleksei,

you really shouldn't be annoyed. My earlier patch was shown to be inferior to 
David Bevan's, and I was obliged to accept the fact. The only possible criteria 
are objective ones: does it work? is it faster? is it simpler? I believe David 
has shown using objective arguments that the patch should not be included. 
That's not a run-around. It is a courteous consideration of your suggestion, 
and 
you should be grateful for it.

Also, you don't help your case at all by remarks like "I think I can get though 
to this guy..." and "It's only you and me who understand these conditions." 
which are at best patronising and at worst impolite.

Best regards,

Graham




----- Original Message ----
From: Алексей Подтележников <address@hidden>
To: freetype-devel <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, 12 November, 2010 12:16:14
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up

I am really annoyed by run-arounds and overzealous protection of code
by authors.

I was proposing a minor benign improvement. I am touching the water so to
speak. What's the big deal? Way to attract developers, freetypers! You go!

_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel