[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ft-devel] cubic clean up
From: |
David Bevan |
Subject: |
RE: [ft-devel] cubic clean up |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:44:48 -0500 |
Aleksei,
If it was indisputably a minor benign improvement, then you'd have reason to be
annoyed. I gave technical reasons why I believe it is not an improvement
(though it is both minor and almost benign). Others are quite free to disagree
on technical grounds.
David %^>
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of ??????? ?????????????
Sent: 12 November 2010 12:16
To: freetype-devel
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up
I am really annoyed by run-arounds and overzealous protection of code
by authors.
I was proposing a minor benign improvement. I am touching the water so to
speak. What's the big deal? Way to attract developers, freetypers! You go!
_______________________________________________
Freetype-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
- [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/08
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/11/09
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/10
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/11
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/11/12
- RE: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, David Bevan, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/12
- RE: [ft-devel] cubic clean up,
David Bevan <=
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Behdad Esfahbod, 2010/11/12