Re: [ft-devel] Re: FT_MAX_CURVE_DEVIATION vs ONE_PIXEL cont'd

[Алексей Подтележников]

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Leon Woestenberg
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Attention: blind test. Check the quality of o's.
>>> The better image is vanilla 2.4.3.
>>> The worse image is the HEAD.
>>
>> I consider conic0.png the better image.  However, the differences are
>> very subtle.
>
> I also consider conic0.png to be slightly better (I did the blind test
> *before* reading Werner's response).

Yes, conic0 == 2.4.3, conic_0 == HEAD
The attached is hinted rendering now.
Look for differences between e's and o's.

hinted_conic_.png
Description: PNG image

hinted_conic.png
Description: PNG image