[ft-devel] Re: Report a bug.

[Werner LEMBERG]

> Please forgive me ignorance, but why would the normal
> FT_Get_First_Char/FT_Get_Next_Char not work for this?  Perhaps I
> missed the part in the documentation which states that no glyph
> index will exceed the num_glpyhs count, but I have always treated
> glyph indexes as a discontinuous sequence.

FT_Get_{First,Next}_Char are walking over cmaps, not over glyph
indices.  Except for subsetted CID-keyed CFFs (which use CIDs instead
of glyph indices), the range for glyph indices is *always* contiguous.


    Werner