[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:06:52 +0100 (CET) |
> > Aah, this isn't 8ppem! This is 8pt at 96dpi which corresponds to
> > approx. 10.5ppem.
>
> Sorry, I misread your first message. Screenshot has been updated.
> http://hkitchen.quakesrc.org/tahoma.png
>
> This is the best I could do.
Indeed. Windows obeys the gasp table which says that antialiasing
should be used for ppem values <= 8.
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Victor Luchits, 2005/03/18
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, David Turner, 2005/03/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/26
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Victor Luchits, 2005/03/25
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Rogier van Dalen, 2005/03/25
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Victor Luchits, 2005/03/25
- Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT,
Werner LEMBERG <=
RE: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Turner, David, 2005/03/30
Re: [ft-devel] Two patches for FT, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/03/30