[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Devel] Renaming PfaEdit
From: |
George Williams |
Subject: |
[Devel] Renaming PfaEdit |
Date: |
25 Feb 2004 11:39:24 -0800 |
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 02:05, Turner David wrote:
> By the way, in a similar vain, what about renaming "PfaEdit" to something
> a bit more catchy ? I mean, here's a great program with a very poor, and
> even misleading, name. What about something like "Font Forge", which doesn't
> seem to be taken yet ?
You are right, it should be renamed. Others have told me this too. I
haven't done anything about it partly out of laziness, partly because
there's never been a point where I felt that the program had recently
changed enough to warrant a new name, and partly because I haven't come
up with a good one. I rather like FontForge though...
(At one point PfaEdit was apropos, but it kept accreting features)
Other suggestions
Fontissimo
Font Workbench
Boustrophedon
glyph
gramma
Daedalus
was my favorite for a while (I've never understood why URW
named their program after the guy who failed to fly, rather
than the one who succeeded)... but that seemed a bit
presumptuous (or hubristic I guess would be a better term
given the context).
FreeFont
(to match freetype) sounded good, but then I decided that
people would think it was a public domain font rather than
an editor.
FalseType
sounded amusing, but isn't good advertising.
Fontastic
(a play on fantastic) has already been used.
Fonciful
(fanciful) perhaps...
Scribo
but that's better for a word processor...
Any suggestions or votes?