Re: [Devel] FT_CONFIG_OPTION_INCREMENTAL question

[David Turner]

Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> In ftoption.h, there is the following line:
>
>   /* #define FT_CONFIG_OPTION_INCREMENTAL */
>
> Shouldn't this rather be
>
>   #undef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_INCREMENTAL
>
> (as it has been a few months ago)?  Currently, the convention in
> ftoption.h is that #define lines which are commented out will be
> possibly overridden in a local configuration file, but
> FT_CONFIG_OPTION_INCREMENTAL doesn't belong into this category IMHO.
> Otherwise, a comment should be added.
I'll leave that to Graham.

Maybe he's using something like "cc -DFT_CONFIG_OPTION_INCREMENTAL" in
its Makefiles to avoid providing a custom config file ?

Regards,

- David Turner
- The FreeType Project  (www.freetype.org)


--
This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the
addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please
delete it and immediately notify the sender.
Any use not in accordance with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure,
either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval.
The E-Mail transmission can not guarantee the integrity of this message.
CANAL+TECHNOLOGIES will not therefore be liable for the message if modified.