[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about bug tracking
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: about bug tracking |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 01:20:48 +0200 (CEST) |
> > As a first step we should probably go the GNU way by introducing a
> > ChangeLog file. Attached is a script `commit' which should be
> > used instead of `cvs commit'; it checks whether there is a valid
> > entry in the ChangeLog file, and it automatically produces correct
> > CVS log file entries from the ChangeLog file.
>
> I myself am doing it the other way: I have made a (Perl) script
> generating a changelog (it is not exactly the GNU-like ChangeLog but
> it would not be hard to adjust the format) from the output of "cvs
> log".
But isn't it better to edit the `visible' file instead of the
`invisible' ones?
Werner
- Re: positive descender with type1 fonts, David Turner, 2000/10/03
- Re: positive descender with type1 fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/10/04
- Re: positive descender with type1 fonts, David Turner, 2000/10/11
- Re: about bug tracking, Pavel Kankovsky, 2000/10/19
- Re: about bug tracking,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: about bug tracking, Pavel Kankovsky, 2000/10/20
- Re: about bug tracking, David Turner, 2000/10/20
- Re: about bug tracking, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/10/21