[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pooma-dev] Re: pooma-dev Digest 23 Jun 2003 12:57:44 -0000 Issue 24
From: |
Mark Mitchell |
Subject: |
Re: [pooma-dev] Re: pooma-dev Digest 23 Jun 2003 12:57:44 -0000 Issue 243 |
Date: |
26 Jun 2003 15:29:30 -0700 |
> Ok, I can see this makes sense somehow. The only problem I see is building
> shared libraries - though I think usage of shared libaries in high
> performance computation is very rare. Though, of course, using automake
> will help doing dependencies and installation rules. So while I'm in
> favour of dropping shared library support (and such libtool), I'd be
> rather not willing to miss automake.
I've never really found automake to be much of a win -- relative to GNU
make -- but then again, I've not found it to be much of a loss either.
And you are volunteering to do the work!
So, I'll back out of this debate. :-)
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
address@hidden