RE: [pooma-dev] RFA: DomainIterator.h: Add DomainTraits Specializ ation

[James Crotinger]

I don't think that's it either - the question is, who is directly causing DomainIterator<int> to be instantiated?

        Jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Oldham [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 4:17 PM
> To: James Crotinger
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [pooma-dev] RFA: DomainIterator.h: Add DomainTraits
> Specializ ation
>
>
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:03:10PM -0700, James Crotinger wrote:
> > Since DomainIterator doesn't explicitly use the "int"
> specialization, it
> > seems like this include shouldn't go here - rather it
> should probably go
> > with whatever decided to use an "int" as a domain.
> >
> >   Jim
>
> How about this?  OK to commit?
>
> When trying to compile src/CoordinateSystems/tests/CartesianTest1.cpp,
> gcc 3.0 complained that a DomainTraits specialization was declared
> after the general DomainTraits.  This patch resolve the problem.
>
> 2001 May 23  Jeffrey D. Oldham  <address@hidden>
>
>         * Domain.h: Add DomainTraits.int.h inclusion.
>
> Tested on       sequential Linux using gcc 3.0 by compiling
> CartesianTest1.cpp and the Pooma library
> Approved by     ???you???
>
> Thanks,
> Jeffrey D. Oldham
> address@hidden
>