[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Sep 2016 00:16:20 -0400 |
On Sep 12, 2016, at 09:32 , S. Christian Collins <address@hidden> wrote:
> The problem isn't the envelope, it's the excessive amount of filter Q you are
> using on that layer. What appears to be happening is that the 96 dB of
> resonance amplifies the resonant frequency to a super-high level, which seems
> to be getting capped by a built-in limiter.
Isn’t this the inverse of what the SoundFont spec says should happen? As the
resonance value is increased, the DC gain should decrease, and the peak should
not move:
The resonance is measured as a dB ratio of the resonant peak
to the DC gain. The DC gain at any resonance is half of the
resonance value below the DC gain at zero resonance; hence
the peak height is half the resonance value above DC gain at
zero resonance.
(If I misunderstand something, please have patience. I’m new to this.)
—
Dan
- [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Dan Eble, 2016/09/10
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Dan Eble, 2016/09/10
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, S. Christian Collins, 2016/09/11
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Dan Eble, 2016/09/11
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, S. Christian Collins, 2016/09/11
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Dan Eble, 2016/09/12
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, S. Christian Collins, 2016/09/12
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Dan Eble, 2016/09/12
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Ceresa Jean-Jacques, 2016/09/13
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Ceresa Jean-Jacques, 2016/09/13
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Dan Eble, 2016/09/13
- Re: [fluid-dev] SoundFont exclusiveClass, Dan Eble, 2016/09/13