[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fab-user] idempotency contrib
|
From: |
Ronan Amicel |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Fab-user] idempotency contrib |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:19:59 +0200 |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 16:15, Kevin Horn <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Jeff Schwaber <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> That looks pretty cool. The code and declarative syntax both appear
>> excellent. I do have to admit that I'm not a huge fan of cutesy names,
>> and icanhaz bothers me a bit, though.
>
> Surely other names could be used (I'm not a big fan of 'cutesy' names
> either).
>
> 'ensure' seems like a good candidate to me.
What do you guys think of 'require' ?
--
Ronan Amicel
http://topixtream.com/