Re: [Fab-user] Output of local()

[Christian Vest Hansen]

Hi Sverre.

With your change, the output of whatever is executed with `local()` is
no longer printed to stdout like it used to.

A patch needs to keep that working to be accepted. That is, working in
the same sense of `run` and `sudo` where the output is printed as it
is produced - merely printing "output" prior to returning it is not
good enough in my opinion.

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Jeff Forcier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Sverre,
>
> No, I believe I just never got around to adding it to local(), as I
> never personally use local() and the "run()/sudo() return command
> output" feature was me scratching a specific itch. It's definitely
> something good to add for consistency's sake.
>
> I'll check out your patch, so thanks for that.
>
> Best,
> Jeff
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sverre Johansen
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any reason that local() does not return the output of the
>> commands, like run() and sudo() does?
>>
>> I need this to call `git rev-parse` to use the revision number as part
>> of the deploy directory on the server. I also think it makes sense for
>> keeping consistency between the functions.
>>
>> Attached is a patch that implements this.
>>
>> --
>>           Sverre Johansen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fab-user mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fab-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
>



-- 
Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Christian Vest Hansen.