Re: pre-command-hook not run for DEL

[Johan Bockgård]

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> !       (progn
> !         ;; Since notionally this is a separate command,
> !         ;; run all the hooks that would be run if it were
> !         ;; executed separately.

Note that at this point   this-command = last-command = nil.

> !         (run-hooks 'post-command-hook)
> !         (setq last-command this-command)
> !         (setq this-original-command 'delete-region)
> !         (setq this-command (or (command-remapping this-original-command)
> !                                this-original-command))
> !         (run-hooks 'pre-command-hook)
> !         (call-interactively this-command))

What's the rationale behind the order   POST, PRE, COMMAND?

-- 
Johan Bockgård