|
From: | Jan Djärv |
Subject: | Re: (make-frame-visible), doesn't |
Date: | Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:24:49 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107) |
Stefan Monnier skrev:
else then I guess it's OK to use that, but isn't it odd to refer to a window you can't see as being visible? Maybe not. Australia'sMaybe instead of talking about "visible" we should carefully stick to "visibility" and "invisible". E.g. make-frame-visible is an interactive built-in function in `src/frame.c'. (make-frame-visible &optional FRAME)Set the visibility of frame FRAME (assuming it is an X window).If omitted, FRAME defaults to the currently selected frame.
I think the documentation for make-frame-visible and make-frame-invisible should match. Would it be better to just add:
Note, this may not raise FRAME to the top, use `raise-frame´ for that.Does w32 and mac have make-frame-invisible? In that case we should remove the X window part from that function also.
Jan D.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |