[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: before- and after-string issues
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: before- and after-string issues |
Date: |
Wed, 18 May 2005 18:45:39 -0400 |
> All before-strings from overlays whose beginning-markers don't
> advance, and text properties that are not front-sticky,
>
In the last entry you probably mean
All before-strings from overlays whose beginning-markers do
advance, and text properties that are not front-sticky,
Yes, thanks.
As long as there are no empty overlays: Consider two non-empty overlays
with the same start and end position. One has a before-string the other
an after-string.
This scenario is not fully specified. Please specify, for each
overlay, whether its beginning marker advances and whether its end
marker advances. If you describe a fully-specified scenario,
I presume I can follow it.
But I also fail to understand why you included text properties in the
discrimination. before- and after-strings are overlay properties,
stickyness is a text property.
I forgot that before-string and after-string could not be text
properties too.
- before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/14
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/14
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Kim F. Storm, 2005/05/16
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/18
- Re: before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/18
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Kim F. Storm, 2005/05/18
- Re: before- and after-string issues,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/19
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/20
- Re: before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/23
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/24
Re: before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/18