emacs-pretest-bug
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

initial crash under X on Irix or Solaris


From: Dave Love
Subject: initial crash under X on Irix or Solaris
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:48:09 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

This is compiled with SGI compiler 7.3.1.3m (which builds Emacs 21.3
OK) on Irix 6.5.22 in 32-bit mode.  Running ./emacs -q under X gives a
SEGV.  Gdb doesn't give a sensible stack trace and dbx just gives the
following.  Running in batch, e.g. to build leim, goes OK.

  $ dbx emacs
  dbx version 7.3.3 (78517_Dec16 MR) Dec 16 2001 07:45:22
  Executable /tmp/emacs/src/emacs
  (dbx) run -q
  Unable to correlate regions with rld, object listentry at address 0xfbe0418 
(length 12 bytes) cannot be read: not all in memory (prev entry object list 
address 0xfbe0418: object number 1)
  (dbx) 

On Solaris 9 I get an immediate segv under X.  With gcc (32-bit):

(gdb) r -q
Starting program: /var/tmp/emacs/src/emacs -q

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
realize_face (cache=0x3c30a0, attrs=0xffbff420, c=0, base_face=0x0, 
    former_face_id=1) at /dl/sr/homes/px/fx/esrc/src/xfaces.c:5471
5471      if (face->fontset >= 0)
(gdb) p face
$1 = (struct face *) 0x0
(gdb) bt
#0  realize_face (cache=0x3c30a0, attrs=0xffbff420, c=0, base_face=0x0, 
    former_face_id=1) at /dl/sr/homes/px/fx/esrc/src/xfaces.c:5471
#1  0x000b30b8 in realize_named_face (f=0x329800, symbol=3330601, id=1)
    at /dl/sr/homes/px/fx/esrc/src/xfaces.c:7009
#2  0x000b3240 in realize_basic_faces (f=0x329800)
    at /dl/sr/homes/px/fx/esrc/src/xfaces.c:6841
#3  0x000b45bc in init_frame_faces (f=0x329800)
    at /dl/sr/homes/px/fx/esrc/src/xfaces.c:909
#4  0x000f7480 in init_sys_modes ()
    at /dl/sr/homes/px/fx/esrc/src/sysdep.c:1658
#5  0x000dee58 in main (argc=2, argv=0xffbff9ac)
    at /dl/sr/homes/px/fx/esrc/src/emacs.c:1687
(gdb) 

With Sun C 5.6 I got a similar backtrace, but it crashed in cache_face.

Is no-one testing proprietary systems, even Solaris?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]