[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?
From: |
Juan LEON Lahoz Garcia |
Subject: |
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud? |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:18:17 +0200 |
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:27:27 +0200, Juri Linkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> > If I find error while compiling, next-error put a fringe arrow in the
> > error line. If I fix the error and compile again, the fringe arrow
> > does not dissapear (I do not if this is intended to be this way).
>
> What is the most suitable time for the fringe arrow to disappear?
> After recompile? After a delay for specified time? After the user
> clicks on the fringe arrow? Maybe this should be configurable.
IMHO, most suitable time would be when recompiling again.
But despite of this, there is no guarantee that some other "package" (like
gud) will not try to use the fringe arrow before recompiling, so making arrow
to disapear based on user actions may be not the right solution.
--
juanleon
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, (continued)
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/31
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Nick Roberts, 2005/03/31
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/31
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/31
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Nick Roberts, 2005/03/31
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/31
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/24
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?,
Juan LEON Lahoz Garcia <=