[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:05:01 +0900 |
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:24:47 -0600 (CST), Luc Teirlinck
<address@hidden> wrote:
> So why is `next-line' so sub-optimal?
>
> It calls line-move.
Er, Ok, so then why is line-move so sub-optimal? It might be a bit
slower than forward-line, but surely it shouldn't cause massive
flickering or whatever, right?
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Peter Seibel, 2005/03/09
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/09
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Peter Seibel, 2005/03/09
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Miles Bader, 2005/03/09
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/09
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/10
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/10
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Jan D., 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Miles Bader, 2005/03/11
- Re: animate incredibly slow compared to 21.3, Jan D., 2005/03/12