[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad UI defaults
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: bad UI defaults |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Apr 2003 07:29:05 -0400 |
* The `mode-line-inactive' face is bright compared with `mode-line',
and different to the menu bar and scroll bar colours. That means
that with two windows -- my most common configuration -- the eye is
drawn to the wrong window.
When I try it, the mode-line face has a darker background
and the mode-line-inactive face has a pale background. I find
that the selected window's mode line stands out more.
* The changed behaviour of the blinking cursor -- solid and empty
box, rather than solid and absent -- makes it hard to read the
character under the cursor, at least with the font I use
(lucidatypewriter-medium-*-normal-*-*-120).
You can change that behavior, I believe. I don't see that it makes
text hard to read in the default font.
* The new mode-line order is worse IMO.
In what way worse?
To me the time, mail status and
battery status are important and shouldn't be shunted off the
right. I don't care about the line number and people who worry
about line numbers usually aren't using Emacs properly.
I often use the line number.
If people generally agree with you on any of these points, I will
agree to change it.
- Re: bad UI defaults, (continued)
Re: bad UI defaults, Dave Love, 2003/04/23
Re: bad UI defaults,
Richard Stallman <=