Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

[Uwe Brauer]

   > Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:

   > I think I could easily convince people to use an online system, or one
   > that works in Markdown (which would be nice). The killer is the history
   > tracking: everyone's used to Track Changes, and it would take a real
   > revolution to dislodge them from that.


Another idea would be to use https://www.authorea.com/ which uses latex.
I had a look it was not for me, but it allows via a git plugin to use an
external editor and to push and to pull. I have not looked into its
track change functionality but may be it is worth a try.


   > Even I, the supposedly technical one, screw up git regularly.

Interesting, I chose mercurial and never had a problem. When I had a
look at authorea I thought about switching from RCS to git but found it
to difficult for, mercurial was much easier and has a git plugin which
works nicely.
Mercurial also as an annotate functionality (supported by emacs) which
is nice and comes close to a change track (but of course it is linewise
not wordwise).

Uwe