[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] small caps
From: |
Thomas S . Dye |
Subject: |
Re: [O] small caps |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:39:11 -1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.12-1c98835; emacs 24.5.1 |
Aloha Aaron,
Aaron Ecay <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> 2015ko urriak 29an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Matt Price <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> do we have a syntax for the "small caps" text attribute in Org?
>>
>> No, we don't.
>>
>>> If not, should we?
>>
>> We cannot have a syntax for everything. A macro can probably replace
>> missing syntax.
>
> This is true. But small-caps are meaningful in a variety of contexts,
> and they are not a truly new syntax (requiring extra code in the parser),
> but rather can be handled exactly as the other emphasis markers. (They
> would require support from the exporters of course.)
>
> There’s also no rush. Maybe we could revisit the question of adding
> small caps after the emphasis changes you indicated in the roadmap
> thread are decided on. Those might change the cost:benefit evaluation
> for adding this feature.
>
> (FWIW, I’d be in favor of the addition unless some major new consideration
> is introduced by the emphasis changes. A good proportion of the documents
> I write in Org use small caps somehow. It would be good to know for how
> many other users that is the case.)
I use them in almost all my archaeology writing where it is conventional
to make AD, BC, and BP small caps.
All the best,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com
Re: [O] small caps, Rasmus, 2015/10/29
Re: [O] small caps, Robert Klein, 2015/10/29