emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Please confirm your message


From: Denis Bitouzé
Subject: Re: [O] Please confirm your message
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:11:54 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)


Le 14/09/15 à 09h12, Gmane Remailer 
<public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden> a écrit :

> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA).
>
> Your message attached below is being held because the address
> <address@hidden> has not been verified.
>
> To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
> to the following address, or use your mailer's "Reply" feature.
>
>    public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden
>
> This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
> junk-mail. You should only have to confirm your address once.
>
> If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 14 days,
> your message will not be delivered.
>
> From: Denis Bitouzé <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Please confirm your message
> To: Gmane Remailer <public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden>
> Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:10:40 +0200 (1 minute, 2 seconds ago)
>
>
> Le 14/09/15 à 08h36, Gmane Remailer 
> <public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden> a écrit :
>
>> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (TMDA).
>>
>> Your message attached below is being held because the address
>> <address@hidden> has not been verified.
>>
>> To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
>> to the following address, or use your mailer's "Reply" feature.
>>
>>    public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden
>>
>> This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
>> junk-mail. You should only have to confirm your address once.
>>
>> If you do not respond to this confirmation request within 14 days,
>> your message will not be delivered.
>>
>> From: Denis Bitouzé <address@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: Bug: \vert{} exported to markdown not as expected [8.3.1
>>      (8.3.1-103-g366dc4-elpa @ /home/bitouze/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20150907/)]
>> To: Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden>
>> Cc: Denis Bitouzé
>>      <address@hidden>,
>>      public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/address@hidden
>> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:35:04 +0200 (35 minutes, 18 seconds ago)
>>
>>
>> Le 13/09/15 à 22h47, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>
>>> Denis Bitouzé <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> 1. For _, \under{} is necessary since _ at the org mode level is
>>>>    exported as \_.
>>>> 2. For |, source | could be okay. But I'd like to use strings as above
>>>>    in tables and, AFAIK, the only way to have pipe symbols in a table at
>>>>    the org mode level is to code them \vert{}.  And that's the purpose
>>>>    of my bug report, \vert{} is exported as &vert;, not as "real" |.
>>>>
>>>> In other words, I was happy with \under{} that exports real _ and,
>>>> IMHO, \vert{} should do the same with |.
>>>
>>> Markdown export back-end use :html conventions to translate entities.
>>> For some reason, HTML prefers &vert; over |, and so does markdown.
>>
>> &vert; and | are displayed the same way but can have different
>> "meanings".
>>
>>> There are a few options available:
>>>
>>>   1. Prefer | over &vert; in HTML
>>
>> Maybe I'm wrong but wouldn't this break backward compatibility?
>>
>>>   2. Overwrite "vert" entity with a new one that would do 1. So
>>>      basically, this is 1 but on your machine only.
>>
>> The feature I'm requesting may be useful to others.
>>
>>>   3. Use a new entity that becomes | when used in HTML export.
>>
>> It would be harmless.
>>
>>> WDYT?
>>
>> The 3rd option looks the best one to me.
>>
>> Regards.
-- 
Denis




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]