|
From: | Rasmus |
Subject: | Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal |
Date: | Sat, 21 Feb 2015 13:00:44 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Lawrence <address@hidden> writes: > You're right that consistency in that syntax would be a good thing. > Moreover, Org already has syntax that looks a lot like plists in > #+ATTR_BACKEND lines and in Babel source block headers, so it seems > natural to adopt something like it for other sorts of objects. Org also already has [fn:·:·] that already is supported inline and looks an awful lot like [cite:·:·]. . . —Rasmus -- Hooray!
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |