[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Why not push?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Why not push? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Feb 2015 23:31:05 +0100 |
On 2015-02-15, at 13:26, Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ah well, maybe we'll trick someone else into it :)
;-)
> My own personal project is to spend a bit of every day working on the
> emacs packages that make my computing life possible: Org, Gnus, and
> BBDB. I'd prefer to spend most of it on Org, but the fact is that when
> your email setup is broken, that always takes priority. Org and Gnus
> both suffer (and both benefit) from wild and messy codebases. Org has
> Nicolas to help whip it into shape; Gnus doesn't.
That is a good one. It wouldn't work for me, though, for reason I've
explained earlier.
> If you're just reading code, ox-latex is a great place to start. If
> you're fixing code, org-agenda could use some love...
Well, since I want to write a modification of the LaTeX exporter,
ox-latex seems a natural thing to look at. OTOH, org-agenda looks scary
;-).
> Eric
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
Re: [O] Why not push?, Rasmus, 2015/02/15
Re: [O] Why not push?, Sebastien Vauban, 2015/02/16