Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts

[Rasmus]

Hi,

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Fabrice Popineau <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Given that it is only a matter of presentation, does that mean it could be
>> changed ?
>> If yes, I can try to give it a shot.
>
> If you mean that a^bc should be equivalent to a^{b}c, then I think it is
> superior in its current state.

As I understand Fabrice's mail, it's only about display of scripts in
Org buffers (when org-pretty-entities-include-sub-superscripts is
non-nil).  So rather than displaying

(+)   \(a^nb^n\)

as

      \(aⁿᵇⁿ\)

it would be displayed as

(*)   \(aⁿbⁿ\)

Of course, it /only/ makes sense to change how it is displayed in
math-mode, for which (*) is the more accurate depiction of (+).

If what was indeed what Fabrice had in mind I think it makes sense.
But I also have been bothered by how (+) is displayed in the past. . .

—Rasmus

-- 
I hear there's rumors on the, uh, Internets. . .