[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [RFC] Block switches as #+HEADER: args?
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [RFC] Block switches as #+HEADER: args? |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:45:32 +0200 |
Hello,
Thorsten Jolitz <address@hidden> writes:
> and at least in the 2nd case the switches are lost, because they don't
> work as header args:
[...]
> #+HEADER: -n
> #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
> Hallo World
> whats up?
> #+END_EXAMPLE
This is not valid syntax. Switches are to be put on the block line.
Only header arguments can be put on a #+HEADER line. See
(info "(Org) Structure of code blocks")
in particular the difference between switches and header arguments.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou