[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters
From: |
Eric Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: [O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:12:07 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Ah yes, this won't work if your font draws characters at variable
widths. I use Chinese a lot, and some Chinese fonts will still create
misalignment, simply because a Chinese character as drawn as 192% the
width of an ascii character. Dunno how to get around that.
On 02/11/14 10:50 AM, Steffan Iverson wrote:
> Thanks Eric - I've used this patch but I doesn't seem to solve the
> problem. I'm working on an earlier suggestion by Michael about the
> unicode type that my Tibetan font is. I very much appreciate all this
> help!
>
> Steffan
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Eric Abrahamsen <
> address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >> I've been using that patch or something like it for nearly a
> year now,
> >> with no adverse effects. I'm on the road right now, give me a
> day and
> >> I'll take a closer look at what I've got...
> >
> > Great -- thanks in advance! I'll then wait before releasing a
> new
> > minor version and merging it into Emacs for Emacs 24.4.
> >
> > To other core maintainers: if you see important issues that
> needs to
> > be fixed in maint, let me know.
>
> Sorry this took a while to get to...
>
> I think it was a little simpler than I thought -- at least I hope
> that's
> true, and I'm not missing something really obvious. There are two
> patches attached, a simple one that handles re-justification of
> table
> fields during field movement, and another that allows for
> narrowing of
> columns with double-width strings. The second patch is uglier,
> and
> doesn't work 100% well (you get misalignment if you try to narrow
> a
> double-wide to an odd number of single-width characters), but
> it's
> better than nothing.
>
> Please test!
>
> Eric
>
- Re: [O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters, (continued)
Re: [O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters, Bastien, 2014/02/03