[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:31:37 +0100 |
Hello,
Nick Dokos <address@hidden> writes:
> Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> "Sebastien Vauban" wrote:
>>
>>> But I wonder: how can you now reproduce it (and not before)?
>>
>> Because I downloaded a snapshot of Org.
>> Your problem is not with code that is in Emacs current trunk.
>
> Using Glenn's reproducer, I bisected it - another one for Nicolas's
> TODO list, proving once again that no good deed goes unpunished :-)
>
> 0cecf32a0ae559266555b96668dc305710366c96 is the first bad commit
> commit 0cecf32a0ae559266555b96668dc305710366c96
> Author: Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun Oct 27 11:09:17 2013 +0100
Well. The only thing related to load/autoload I can think of is calling
`org-element-cache-reset' in `org-mode' and `org-set-modules'.
Could you try to replace these calls with
(when (fboundp 'org-element-cache-reset) (org-element-cache-reset))
and test again?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice, Nick Dokos, 2013/11/15
- Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice, Nick Dokos, 2013/11/16
- Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice, Nick Dokos, 2013/11/16
- Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/11/17
- Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice, Nick Dokos, 2013/11/17
- Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice, Nick Dokos, 2013/11/17
Re: [O] bug#15888: 24.3.50; Eval-after-load eval'ed twice, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/19