emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Item task_id not being used in taskjuggler export & tj prefixing


From: Nicolas Goaziou
Subject: Re: [O] Item task_id not being used in taskjuggler export & tj prefixing
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:01:54 +0200

John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:

> I agree and would prefer this. Especially since folks wanting to
> export and being allowed to access tj functionality through drawers
> are probably going to anticipate using actual tj syntax in those
> drawers. Since tj only forces unique global ids (one can have M.T8,
> T.T8, etc.), this would solve the issue of ambiguity should one decide
> to use non-globally unique task ids. In fact, many projects may very
> well use a lot of repetitive tasks with the same properties.
>
> In mine, I have some tasks regarding shipping products to various
> countries. This way I could just have a bunch of country-specific
> headlines like:
>
> * Country
> ** Ship product
>
> * Country 2
> ** Ship product
>
> And could give all the ** Ship... tasks the same id since their
> Country parent would make it globally unique.

You can already do so. IDs only have to be unique within the task
siblings.

> For now, I'm just happy to have functionality restored so I can use
> Org and not hand-edit the files after exporting :) I have a potential
> IRC date with Christian Egli sometime this week... perhaps you should
> join and add your feedback? One of my other points of input would be
> that something like C-c l (Org store link at point) would be great.
> Unique ids could be inserted as depends with some simple key strokes
> and I would't have to use numbered IDs at all. They'd stay with the
> tasks no matter where I moved them.
>
> For that... I'd actually prefer *not* to have to explicitly name the
> parent since they could move wherever I put them with no consequence.

You don't have to name parents either. You only need to name tasks that
will be used as a dependency.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]