Re: [O] Copying subtrees with footnotes

[Samuel Wales]

Not a direct answer to your question, but:

I find that inline footnotes solve a lot of problems:
locality of reference is a huge deal both cognitively and
for organization; they cannot be put in the wrong sections
by mistake; they can't get numbers mixed up; they can't get
deleted or commented without the corresponding part doing so
in the normal case; it is not necessary to follow them to
check to see if they are there or what they are or where
they are; they can't get refiled or separated from their
definitions by headline additions; and they trigger fewer
numbering bugs.

They also, apparently, can be copied more easily.

Samuel

On 3/20/13, Florian Beck <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to copy subtrees between org-buffers, but `org-copy-subtree'
> ignores footnotes (which is technically correct, I guess). Is there any
> way to automate this?
> --
> Florian Beck
>
>


-- 
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com

The disease DOES progress.  MANY people have died from it.  ANYBODY
can get it.  There is NO hope without action.  This means YOU.