[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] GFDL
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] GFDL |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Mar 2013 16:11:05 +0100 |
On 9.3.2013, at 16:02, Achim Gratz <address@hidden> wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>> I am wondering, are we required to include the full text of the GFDL
>> in the manual? I find it a big waste of space and feed that a link
>> should do. But I have not been able to find the rules that say what
>> needs to be included in a document distributed under GFDL?
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-howto
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html
>
> "To use this License in a document you have written, include a copy of
> the License in the document and put the following copyright and license
> notices just after the title page:[…]"
>
> I read this: If there's just one document, it must contain the license
> in full, if there are several that reference each other, it is enough to
> include it in the top-level document.
Yes it sounds like it. Thank you for the link.
I still think it is crazy to add these 8 pages to each time someone prints
it....
Regards
- Carsten
- [O] GFDL, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL,
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [O] GFDL, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/10
- Re: [O] GFDL, Achim Gratz, 2013/03/10
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/10
- Re: [O] GFDL, Alan L Tyree, 2013/03/09
- Re: [O] GFDL, Carsten Dominik, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] GFDL, Marcin Borkowski, 2013/03/19
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/03/19