[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] SETUPFILE and variants
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] SETUPFILE and variants |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:12:40 +0100 |
Hello,
"Sebastien Vauban"
<address@hidden> writes:
> With the new exporter, I still couldn't find how to use a setup file.
>
> Neither with:
>
> - the old `#+SETUPFILE:' directive
Still working here.
> - the new one (?): `#+SETUP_FILE:'
It has been dropped. You can safely forget it.
> - the soon to be unique one (?): `#+INCLUDE:'
It should work too.
I had indeed considered dropping #+SETUPFILE. but if we keep it, we
might be able to define an :EXPORT_SETUPFILE: for subtree export (not
implemented). So, after all, I
Anyway, for the time being, I prefer to focus on real bugs.
> ECM file:
>
> #+TITLE: Example of Tasks
> #+AUTHOR: Sebastien Vauban
> #+DESCRIPTION:
> #+KEYWORDS:
> #+LANGUAGE: en
>
> #+INCLUDE: "~/src/org-style/bigblow.setup"
>
> * Marketing
>
> ** STRT Hire PR firm
What does "bigblow.setup" contain? I have no problem with this ECM.
Also what did you expect?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou