Re: [O] Babel: communicating irregular data to R source-code block

[Thomas S. Dye]

Aloha Michael,

Michael Hannon <address@hidden> writes:

> Greetings.  I'm sitting in on a weekly, informal, "brown-bag" seminar on data
> technologies in statistics.  There are more people attending the seminar than
> there are weeks in which to give talks, so I may get by with being my usual,
> passive-slug self.
>
> But I thought it might be useful to have a contingency plan and decided that
> giving a brief talk about Babel might be useful/instructive.  I thought (and
> think) that mushing together (with attribution) some of the content of the
> paper [1] by The Gang of Four and the content of Eric's talk [2] might be a
> good approach.  (BTW, if this isn't legal, desirable, permissible, etc., this
> would be a good time to tell me.)
>
> I liked the Pascal's Triangle example (which morphed from elisp to Python, or
> vice versa, in the two references), but I was afraid that the elisp routine
> "pst-check", used as a check on the correctness of the previously-generated
> Pascal's triangle, might be too esoteric for this audience, not to mention me.
> (The recursive Fibonacci function is virtually identical in all languages,
> but the second part is more obscure.)
>
> I thought it should be possible to use R to do the same sanity check, as R
> would be much more-familiar to this audience (and its use would still
> demonstrate the meta-language feature of Babel).
>
> Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find a way to communicate the output of
> the Pascal's Triangle example to an R source-code block.  The gist of the
> problem seems to be that regardless of how I try to grab the data (scan,
> readLines, etc.) Babel always ends up trying to read a data frame (table) and
> I get an error similar to:
>
> <<<<<<
>> Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings,
>> : line 1 did not have 5 elements
>
> Enter a frame number, or 0 to exit   
>
> 1: read.table("/tmp/babel-3780tje/R-import-3780Akj", header = FALSE, row.names
> = NULL, sep = "
>>>>>>>
>
> If I construct a table "by hand" with all of the cells occupied, everything
> goes OK.  For instance:
>
> <<<<<<
> #+TBLNAME: some-junk
> | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
> | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
> | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
> | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 
>
> #+NAME: read-some-junk(sj_input=some-junk)
> #+BEGIN_SRC R
>
> rowSums(sj_input)
>
> #+END_SRC  
>
> #+RESULTS: read-some-junk
> | 1 |
> | 2 |
> | 4 |
> | 8 |
>>>>>>>
>
> But the following gives the kind of error I described above:
>
> <<<<<<
> #+name: pascals_triangle
> #+begin_src python :var n=5 :exports none :return pascals_triangle(5)
> def pascals_triangle(n):
>     if n == 0:
>         return [[1]]
>     prev_triangle = pascals_triangle(n-1)
>     prev_row = prev_triangle[n-1]
>     this_row = map(sum, zip([0] + prev_row, prev_row + [0]))
>     return prev_triangle + [this_row]
>
> pascals_triangle(n)
> #+end_src

A few things are wrong at this point.  It seems the JSS article has
an error in the header of the pascals_triangle source block.  AFAIK
there is no header argument :return.  I don't know how :return
pascals_triangle(5) got there, but am fairly certain it shouldn't be.

Second is the last line of the source block.  It should read: 
return pascals_triangle(n)

Third, in the JSS article the name of the source code block is
pascals-triangle, to distinguish it from the name of the python function
pascals_triangle (note the underscore in place of the hyphen). 

So, with these changes made, I have this, which works for me:

#+name: pascals-triangle
#+begin_src python :var n=5 :exports none 
  def pascals_triangle(n):
      if n == 0:
          return [[1]]
      prev_triangle = pascals_triangle(n-1)
      prev_row = prev_triangle[n-1]
      this_row = map(sum, zip([0] + prev_row, prev_row + [0]))
      return prev_triangle + [this_row]
  return pascals_triangle(n)
#+end_src

#+RESULTS: pascals-triangle
| 1 |   |    |    |   |   |
| 1 | 1 |    |    |   |   |
| 1 | 2 |  1 |    |   |   |
| 1 | 3 |  3 |  1 |   |   |
| 1 | 4 |  6 |  4 | 1 |   |
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 1 |

#+CALL: pascals-triangle(5)

#+RESULTS: pascals-triangle(5)
| 1 |   |    |    |   |   |
| 1 | 1 |    |    |   |   |
| 1 | 2 |  1 |    |   |   |
| 1 | 3 |  3 |  1 |   |   |
| 1 | 4 |  6 |  4 | 1 |   |
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 1 |

>
> #+RESULTS: pascals_triangle
> | 1 |   |    |    |   |   |
> | 1 | 1 |    |    |   |   |
> | 1 | 2 |  1 |    |   |   |
> | 1 | 3 |  3 |  1 |   |   |
> | 1 | 4 |  6 |  4 | 1 |   |
> | 1 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 1 |
>
> #+name: pst-checkR(pas_inputs=pascals_triangle)
> #+BEGIN_SRC R
>
> rowSums(pas_inputs)
>
> #+END_SRC

I vaguely remember that it once was possible to pass variables in
through the name line, but I couldn't find this syntax in some fairly
recent documentation.  It does appear to work still using a recent
Org-mode.  If I rename the results and then pass that to the source code
block, all is well.

#+RESULTS: pascals-tri
| 1 |   |    |    |   |   |
| 1 | 1 |    |    |   |   |
| 1 | 2 |  1 |    |   |   |
| 1 | 3 |  3 |  1 |   |   |
| 1 | 4 |  6 |  4 | 1 |   |
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 1 |

  
#+name: pst-checkR(p=pascals-tri)
#+BEGIN_SRC R
p
#+END_SRC

#+RESULTS: pst-checkR

| 1 | nil | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| 1 |   1 | nil | nil | nil | nil |
| 1 |   2 |   1 | nil | nil | nil |
| 1 |   3 |   3 |   1 | nil | nil |
| 1 |   4 |   6 |   4 | 1   | nil |
| 1 |   5 |  10 |  10 | 5   | 1   |

This looks like a bug to me, but Eric S. will know better what might be
going on.  I can't do much more than this, but I'm optimistic things
will be sorted out before your turn to speak at the seminar rolls
around.

Thanks for bringing the error in the JSS article to light.

All the best,
Tom

>>>>>>>
>
> Note that I don't really want to do rowSums in this case.  I'm just trying to
> demonstrate the error.
>
> Of course, it's clear that the first line does NOT contain five elements, nor
> does the second, etc., as all of the above-diagonal elements are blanks.
>
> But I've been unable to find an R input function that doesn't end up treating
> the source data as a table, i.e., in the context of Babel source blocks -- R
> is "happy" to read a lower-diagonal structure.  See the appendix for an
> example.
>
> Any suggestions?  Note that I'm happy to acknowledge that my own ignorance of
> R and/or Babel might be the source of the problem.  If so, please enlighten
> me.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Mike
>
> [1] http://www.jstatsoft.org/v46/i03
> [2] https://github.com/eschulte/babel-presentation
>
> <<<<<<
> Appendix
> --------
>
>
> $ cat pascal.dat
> 1
> 1 1
> 1 2 1
> 1 3 3 1
> 1 4 6 4 1
>
> $ R --vanilla < pascal.R
>
> R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30)
> Copyright (C) 2012 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
> ISBN 3-900051-07-0
> Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (64-bit)
> .
> .
> .
>
>> x <- readLines("pascal.dat")
>> x
> [1] "1"         "1 1"       "1 2 1"     "1 3 3 1"   "1 4 6 4 1"
>> str(x)
>  chr [1:5] "1" "1 1" "1 2 1" "1 3 3 1" "1 4 6 4 1"
>> 
>> y <- scan("pascal.dat")
> Read 15 items
>> y
>  [1] 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 4 6 4 1
>> str(y)
>  num [1:15] 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 ...
>> 
>> z <- read.table("pascal.dat", header=FALSE)
> Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings,  : 
>   line 1 did not have 5 elements
> Calls: read.table -> scan
> Execution halted
>
>

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com