Re: [O] Orthogonality of blocks

[Jambunathan K]

If I look at the figures in the link provided, I am reminded of table.el
tables. 

Put your different src blocks in table.el tables, this way even if you
don't get fontification of src blocks atleast you will have a
side-by-side output with both html and latex backends.

Charles Turner <address@hidden> writes:

> On 27/12/11 21:12, Christian Moe wrote:
>> will do it in HTML. Full example follows below. I'll leave LaTeX to
>> those in the know...
>
> Thanks. This was the "best" solution for me. I quote because the
> abstraction boundary between "how it's rendered" and "what I want to
> be rendered" is getting fuliginous. It would be much better imo to
> have blocks of first-class, and functions of higher-order on those
> blocks, so one could say (side-by-side block1 block2) and the
> side-by-side procedure would deal with the different format
> nuances. The idea is similar to that of the Henderson Escher examples
> in SICP[1], where you have "painters" and functions that combine
> "painters" in interesting ways.  Might be fun to investigate how far
> that can go with blocks in org.
>
> @Jambunathan: Your examples render the blocks with sizes proportional
> to the contained text, rather than aligning as a table. I find that
> aesthetically displeasing :-(
>
> Thanks all for the help.
>       Charles.
>
> [1] http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book-Z-H-15.html#%_sec_2.2.4
>
>

--